District of Karmic donated pedestrians and cyclists glare

This year police officers from the Police Station in Kwacha patrolling the area cemeteries distributed among cyclists safety vest and reflective bands.

The motto of the action is “Be visible on the road.” As reported by Chamberlain of. Mir slaw Szymanski of the CPP in Raciborz, autumn action of giving reflective elements, it’s tradition, the police stress that many accidents could be avoided if the participants of the event were able to take care of your safety and apply the principle of limited trust. Pedestrians, is vulnerable traffic participants. Any collision is more dangerous for them than for drivers, which protects the design of the car.

Therefore, remember that reflective element allow us to be more visible on the road, especially now, when dusk falls early – adds M. Szymanski.

Talks and glare. In Kilburn children will be safer

The municipal guards with Kuroki want to improve the safety of children on the road. They began a campaign to distribute glare.

During the meetings with children guards talking about safety and explain to them what dangers lie in wait for them on the road.

Some schools located in villages, especially there may occur a dangerous situation – says the commander of the Municipal Police in Lurk Andrej Kemah. – The aim is to improve safety. The campaign runs mainly in the first years of primary school. Municipal police officers also meet with preschoolers – ads Kiamichi.

All kindergartens of the municipality Kuroki also received reflective vest for children.

Thanks to the common walks of preschoolers will be safer – adds Kiamichi.

Taxi companies must compensate affected in traffic accidents

The statement was made the Supreme Court to convict a company in Cucuta for damages suffered by a woman who was hit by a taxi driver in reflective vest.

On 13 March 2001 a woman on a motorcycle in the urban area of Cucuta (Norte de Santander) was hit by a taxi driver who did not respect traffic rules. In action he suffered serious injuries on his body by which had to be surgically operated. (See Fault Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court)

Because violence hit the woman had a brain trauma, injuries prevent you from doing sport, recreational activities, and even have a married life. The victim reported the driver, identified as Jose Trinidad Torres Galvez, as well as a lawsuit against Cucuta Conveyor Cooperative S.A. and Liberty Saguaros S.A.

On February 24, 2011 in court ruling civil court room Cucuta denied claims in the application, when submitting an appeal the Superior Court of the Judicial District of Cucuta who endorsed the demand for material, moral and physiological damages arising from injuries caused by indexing interests.

The taxi company disagreed and filed an extraordinary appeal to the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court. With a presentation by Judge Luis Armando Villanova Tools he reminded that taxi companies are obliged to compensate those affected by traffic accidents.

In the legal debate the arguments the taxi driver who felt that the blame was unique to the victim since he had no driving license, compulsory insurance, helmet, safety vest and driving at high speed on a path of high flow they were rejected vehicle, meanwhile the Transportation Cooperative Cucuta Ltda. Resisted requests by “lack of responsibility”, having no material or legal guardian of the taxi involved, because it did not explode and only entered the owner relationship agreement for use of its name.

Remember the Supreme Court that the contract signed between the company and the driver was responsible for the former as “watcher generating activity injury” by which is subject to reproach the fact that want to evade this legal relationship face to the court action seeking reparation for the damage caused.

For the Civil Chamber there is enough to consider that there is a direct relationship after signing the affiliation contract law. “It is a duty of care, exercise power of command, leadership and effective control of the vehicle, assuming duties of diligence”.

“The affiliation agreement through which the owner of the vehicle with reflective tape is authorized to perform the public service in the respective mode, therefore, makes the company subject of rights and duties and the burden imposed on them respond for damages are caused to third parties that are caused to third parties in the exercise of the dangerous activity that involved the mobilization of motor vehicles to satisfy the aforementioned service.”

My daily in the House are fighting to preserve freedom

This year’s second amendment, last year we approved four amendments to this Act and three the year before, so that within three years the nine amendments to this Act and the Minister in his opening speech said that officials are already hard at work on another amendment. An example of how we roll those laws and how to absorb or cannot keep ourselves when Mr. Deputy Kwela in safety vest says that for offenses is one year limitation period and we have already approved the change for two years. And how then has to confess that citizen if we do not know what we approved and that the change is one hundred per cent, from one to two years.

It’s maybe look like it, but we do every day in the Chamber of Deputies are fighting to preserve freedom. Yesterday it was the smoking ban. Here today we have two amendments, which seek greater freedom, but thus also for greater accountability. Firstly, the proposal of Mr. Deputy Junes, who proposes in accordance with a number of European countries – I read in the second reading the list of more than twenty European countries, where it tolerates low alcohol borders with cyclists in reflective clothing. Yes, this increases freedom, but it also increases the responsibility of cyclists. We as a club we support this proposal because it goes in the right direction.

The second proposal, which in turn increases the freedom and responsibility at the same time, the proposal to increase speeds on selected sections of highways. What did not support, it is the proposal of Mr. Kwela deputy. Let us put it directly: this proposal increases the risk of corruption. A mistake happens to everyone. Let us remember the fate of the previous amendment. Mr. Minister, presumably after consultation with the police, here asserted a right of veto for the Police of the Czech Republic in evaluating road construction. Government rejected most of our amendment, we launched it in order for us to focus the Senate had this bad design section gave away; the minister changed his mind and, in principle, easily passed the Senate version of the previous amendment. Today, if we approve the proposal of Mr. Deputy tow, the same course. Even if it accidentally went through, and I believe that not according to the appearance, because they acted colleagues from many clubs, and now, leaving aside any club solidarity, but when we look at the content and the proposal to increase the risk of corruption, to increase the powers of citizens taking that freedom.

I hope that the Minister will have a negative opinion that this time the police who so love – logically wants more and more powers have a veto here, here, have the right to hold driving licenses etc., but we see it in the polls. These are the things I think really that limit or restrict the freedom of each of us. It is not a technical matter. We should all consider … (The noise in the hall, Mr. Deputy waiting.) Thank you. … How often you want the rules changed. How often do we submit amendments and approve them. Because – and I do not want to talk about those who commit an offense or evade solutions offense proceedings. But if we change it three or four times a year, so we really can justly require everybody to know? To watch, if you happen Deputies and the Senate again they did not get a good idea and in March, June, September and December, four times changed the rules? I think it’s not a good way and we should, if possible, to limit the number of amendments to this Act. Over the last three years, nine novels! It’s just not normal. Eight and ninth is going, Mr. Chairman Social Committee is of course right.

So I firmly believe when we vote on the amendments that will support the camp who defend freedom and reject the camp, which disproportionately increases police powers, and not me, not to forget those reflective vests for deer. Reflective piping, reflective vests, to me, not did the word. Bad idea, bad deal. Indeed, if it declares, so I want to see the enforcement of this obligation. Not that there will be written somewhere – and not the police that will actually solve cases that threaten someone, whether that road users are a threat to himself or anyone else. Or put on some poplins journey, which very often says allocate, and there are to choose from. And he will say – but sir, yours reflective element is not as great as it should be. And the man will say: Well, it seems to me that it shines. He says: No, it does not shine. And we will be more work, because it is such an easy job, check reflective vest, it is much more difficult than being physically present, misaim camera physically in those places where really there’s any traffic problems or traffic accident. Because most: attendance is the physical presence of police officers on the road, or technical design, narrow lanes in the city, giving the islands there. What those drivers voluntarily leads to the fact that I take off my foot off the gas. And not those cameras chop ten thousand shots per day, and then created the incredible queues at the infringement proceedings. Thank you.